Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Hawtal Whiting wants borrowing rules changed

Tom Stevenson
Friday 04 June 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

HAWTAL WHITING, the car designer and engineer, said yesterday it was in breach of its articles of association and would be calling an extraordinary meeting to change the rules governing its borrowing powers, writes Tom Stevenson.

The breach occured when the company's borrowings rose to pounds 14m compared with shareholders' funds of pounds 3.6m. Hawtal's articles forbid borrowings of more than three times net assets.

Chris Russell, finance director, said: 'The group is not in breach of any loan covenants and we still have the confidence of our bankers.' Hawtal's problems were exacerbated when Leyland DAF went into receivership with pounds 1.1m of fees owing to the company.

Hawtal was helping design a van for a joint venture with Renault. The French car maker has taken over the project.

The bad debt contributed to a pounds 1.5m exceptional charge, which also included other doubtful debts and redundancy charges. That led to a pre-tax loss of pounds 2.2m compared with a profit of pounds 197,000 in 1991. There was a loss per share of 40p and the dividend was passed.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in