Hambros settles long case
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.HAMBROS yesterday settled one of the two long-running cases against it involving the late Hilmar Reksten, the Norwegian shipping millionaire.
The bank has agreed to pay the trustees of Mr Reksten's bankrupt estate pounds 7.25m 'to avoid substantial legal costs and demands on senior management time', but with no admission of liability.
The trustees are to drop claims that Hambros was implicated in the transfer of funds from Norway to Mr Reksten's offshore funds, and abandon all litigation.
Christopher Sporborg, deputy chairman of Hambros, said the settlement was a result of an approach by the trustees.
He added that a court hearing followed by the two appeals allowed under Norwegian law could cost as much as the pounds 7.25m payment for settlement of the case, in which the trustees were claiming pounds 80m.
This leaves another pounds 160m case against Hambros by the state-owned Norwegian Guarantee Institute for Ships and Drilling Vessels, which Hambros won earlier this year but which is being appealed. The appeal will not be heard until next April.
So far there has been no approach for a settlement, and if the case goes its full course with a second appeal there could be pounds 5m more of costs for Hambros, even if its original victory is upheld.
The cases go back to the 1970s, and were thought to have been settled in a court-approved agreement in 1981. But the Norwegians reopened the cases in the mid-1980s, claiming new evidence. Hambros shares rose 15p to 360p.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments