Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Guessing fees is a tricky operation

Sue Fieldman
Saturday 14 August 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE Monopolies and Mergers Commission is considering whether there should be no published guidelines for medical fees as part of an investigation into surgeons' and specialists' charges, writes Sue Fieldman. Instead, the public would ring round surgeons to compare the cost of an operation.

If the results of a survey by Western Provident Association, the third-largest medical fees insurer, are anything to go by, the specialists will be laughing all the way to the bank.

The public massively over-estimates the cost of treatment. Need a new hip joint? The British Medical Association has a guideline cost of pounds 775. The respondents in the survey would pay a surgeon on average pounds 2,947.

Perhaps a skin mole needs excising. A simple enough job at a guideline cost of pounds 150. The respondents thought pounds 390 would be about right for this spot of bother. They thought coronary artery bypass surgery should be pounds 4,430, compared with a guideline figure of pounds 2,075. Julian Stainton, managing director of WPA, said: 'People do not have a clue about the real cost. They were all miles out.'

The more complicated the operation, the more people over-estimate the cost. For an upper gastro-intestinal endoscopy the average estimated cost was pounds 1,264. Call it a visual examination of the inside of the stomach and we are prepared to pay only pounds 690. The BMA guideline is pounds 200.

We are prepared to pay a surgeon pounds 514 for the removal of a bunion. If you refer to its proper name, Hallux Valgus, then the surgeon's time is suddenly worth pounds 1,274. The BMA guideline is pounds 585.

Just by calling an operation an 'appendectomy' instead of 'the removal of the appendix' warrants an extra pounds 100 in the patient's eyes.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in