Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Grim borrowing forecasts set to limit Chancellor's scope for pre- poll tax cuts

Diane Coyle
Thursday 04 July 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Government is preparing to announce a new set of economic forecasts that will severely reduce its scope for tax cuts in the run up to the general election. Despite the recent spate of good news about the economy, the Chancellor Kenneth Clarke will next week have to deliver a gloomier outlook than the one he made at the time of the last Budget.

The Treasury is poised to downgrade its forecast for growth in 1996 and admit that government borrowing will be billions of pounds higher than its original target. A shortfall in tax revenues last year has derailed the original borrowing plans.

As a result of the disappointing state of the government's finances, the Chancellor is expected to play down hopes of any tax cuts this year when he publishes the department's summer forecast on Tuesday.

His problem will be how to present the forecast without diluting his upbeat message that the economy will recover by next spring. The Chancellor recently signalled that he would prefer the latest possible election date to take advantage of the recovery in growth which is being fuelled by a strong upturn in consumer spending.

The growth forecast for this year will be cut to 2.5 per cent from 3 per cent, as the Chancellor hinted in last month's Mansion House speech. The promise of 3 per cent growth will be postponed to 1997.

The Treasury's projection for the public sector borrowing requirement will be raised from pounds 22.4bn to around pounds 27bn.

The new Treasury outlook will be released days before ministers and officials meet at Chevening, the foreign secretary's Kent residence, for the first discussion of this year's Budget strategy.

The rickety state of the Government's finances leave Mr Clarke little scope to put more money into voters' pockets, and holds out the prospect of an even tougher spending round with government departments than usual.

Without reductions in planned public expenditure it will be impossible to justify lower taxes, but there are clear signs from areas such as health that the current targets will prove extremely difficult to achieve. The Cabinet is due to discuss expenditure plans within the next fortnight.

Spending has been right on target for the past two financial years. But many economists think the current year's tough target of 1.2 per cent growth will be too difficult to meet.

Steven Bell, chief economist at investment bank Deutsche Morgan Grenfell, said: "It is the normal pattern to play down tax hopes at this time of year." However, the disappointing outlook for the PSBR meant the room for reductions was genuinely limited, he added.

Most City economists still expect Mr Clarke to deliver lower income taxes in the Budget. Bill Martin, chief economist at Swiss bank UBS, said: "He might unveil more public expenditure savings when we get to the Budget. Another pounds 3bn off an already implausible set of plans is neither here nor there."

Mr Martin predicted the incoming government would inherit a large deficit after the election.

The Treasury forecast next week will assume that current spending targets, which were cut by pounds 3.2bn in last November's Budget, are met. However, departmental spending in the first two months of this financial year has run well ahead of the plans, and many observers think the overrun will continue.

In addition, compensation for BSE will eat up much of the contingency reserve for emergency overspending, one of the traditional sources of funds for tax cuts. The cost of the mad cow crisis is currently put at about pounds 2bn over three years.

The net pounds 3.1bn tax cuts announced last Budget, which came into effect in April, were financed from the contingency reserve, tougher plans for spending and the assumption of higher privatisation revenues.

Tax revenues as a whole have now stopped falling behind the Treasury's forecast, although income tax receipts were down 5 per cent in the year to May. But the legacy of last year's pounds 3bn shortfall in VAT and corporation tax receipts was a higher- than-expected level of borrowing at the start of the current financial year.

The slowdown at the end of last year and beginning of this year have forced the downgrade in the growth forecast. Most independent economists thought the 3 per cent prediction made last November was unduly optimistic. But Mr Clarke will predict that the economy is about to pick up strongly, aided by higher consumer spending and a recovery on the Continent boosting exports.

"The Treasury can say that things have been slower than they thought but will improve from now on," said David Walton, an economist at Goldman Sachs. He said a forecast of growth this year of anything up to 2.5 per cent would be plausible, although that would leave the Treasury with one of the most optimistic outlooks.

"They will show the economy reaching what is effectively a policy target of 3 per cent growth in the first half of next year," Mr Martin said.

Comment, page 19

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in