Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Grilling for train chiefs

Richard Halstead
Sunday 16 March 1997 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The director of the Office of Passenger Rail Franchising (Opraf), John O'Brien, will come under intense criticism over the South West Trains affair when he and company executives go before Parliament's Transport Select Committee on Wednesday.

The committee is expected to lambast the regulator over what some MPs describe as "serious lapses in stewardship" of the privatised rail network.

On Friday, in response to a rising tide of criticism from rail groups and politicians, Opraf told South West Trains, a subsidiary of Stagecoach, that it faced a fine of pounds 1m and the possible loss of its franchise after the company cancelled more than 2,500 trains following the introduction of new shift patterns among its drivers on 19 January.

The cancellations arose after South West Trains made too many of its drivers redundant in a cost-cutting exercise. The rail regulator said on Friday that SW Trains would have to deliver at least 98.5 per cent of its minimum service requirement in April and May or be fined. Anything less than 97.5 per cent and the company could lose its franchise, the regulator said.

Andrew Mackinlay, Labour MP for Thurrock and one of the more outspoken members of the Transport Committee, said that the fine threatened by Opraf was "derisory" and added that he would be questioning the rail regulator closely over why service levels were being allowed to fall below the minimum levels set by the franchise contract.

"We will be taking Opraf to task for apparently lacking the will to protect customers and allowing this amazingly bad personnel situation to arise," Mr Mackinlay said.

He added: "This idea of fining them pounds 1m is nonsense. It's just a small slice of the millions of taxpayers' money that has been handed over to them to run the franchise."

Other MPs on the committee were more circumspect about where the blame lay.

Peter Bottomley, Conservative MP for Eltham, said: "It will be interesting to know how they plan to improve their service. But it is worth remembering that if this was the old BR, it would not be possible to demand this level of accountability."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in