Greenbury leaks attacked
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir Denys Henderson, former chairman of ICI and Zeneca and a member of the Greenbury Committee, yesterday stepped into the executive pay row, warning that attacks on Sir Richard Greenbury threatened to put prominent businessmen off such future appointments.
Sir Denys described the vilification of Sir Richard, "one of this country's most successful businessmen", as "quite disgraceful".
He also condemned the leaks that flowed from the committee "right from the inception, despite the fact that all committee members swore a Trappist vow of silence". He said: "This was pretty distasteful, particularly as personal integrity was something I had always been able to count on in companies with which I have been associated."
Sir Denys, chairman of the Rank Organisation, told the Institute of Management's companions annual lunch: "I am sure that those asked to participate in future 'pro bono' studies will think longer and harder before agreeing to add to their heavy workload."
Sir Denys reiterated the committee's view that there was "no good reason" why executive share option schemes should receive favoured tax treatment compared with other long-term incentive schemes.
"Neither is there any obvious reason why executive share option schemes should receive favourable tax treatment at all. We knew that would produce an outcry, but we emphasised strongly that our proposals related to executive share option schemes and not to SAYE or other schemes available to employees," he added.
He regretted that in the furore over stock options, much of "the excellent work" done by the committee in other areas had been overlooked. The "remuneration UK companies offer must be sufficient to attract, retain and motivate directors".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments