Granada options net Allen pounds 3m
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE CHIEF executive of Granada yesterday pocketed more than pounds 3m after cashing in share options in the hotels to television conglomerate.
Charles Allen exercised options over 412,500 shares at prices between 190p and 497p, and promptly sold them all at 1,063p. Mr Allen still holds 30,700 shares in the company. It is understood the proceeds will fund a house just purchased by Mr Allen, which is believed to have cost around pounds 2m.
Granada shares have soared in the past six months, helped by a steady stream of disposals which culminated in Tuesday's sale of its stake in the Savoy luxury hotel group. The shares closed at 1,065p yesterday, up 35p. Last July, they were worth just 738p.
Granada will receive pounds 310m in cash by selling its 68 per cent stake in the Savoy hotel group to Blackstone, the US investment company. The disposal programme, initiated after Granada's successful takeover of the Forte hotels group in February 1996, has brought in a great deal more than expected.
News of the share sale comes just a few weeks after Granada survived a shareholder revolt at its annual general meeting. The company was heavily criticised for making large payments to its executive directors in compensation for reducing the size of their pay-offs in the event of a takeover from three years to two.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments