Granada claims under attack
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.JOHN SHEPHERD
Granada's claims that its Sutcliffe contract catering business was significantly more profitable than that of the arch-rival Gardner Merchant group, recently sold by Forte, came under attack last night.
Garry Hawkes, chairman and chief executive of Gardner which is now owned by Sedexo of France and which Granada tried to buy, said the claims that "we were inefficient were just not true".
The boast about Sutcliffe was made by Alex Bernstein, chairman of Granada, which is trying to buy the Forte hotels group with a hostile pounds 3.3bn takeover bid.
In a press report last week, Mr Bernstein was attributed with saying: "When you have a business like Gardner Merchant, which is cash generative and is making a 3 per cent or 4 per cent return and your competitor is making 10 per cent, then why sell it before you get it up to 10 per cent as well?"
Mr Hawkes has written to each of Sutcliffe's 2,300 clients. In the letter, he said: "The profit margin at Gardner Merchant last year was 5.4 per cent which is more or less in line with the world's other major contract caterers. A 10 per cent margin, as now claimed by Sutcliffe, we believe to be unsustainable.
"We would need to double our profits on our current turnover of pounds 1.2bn to make a 10 per cent margin. This would require us to eliminate our entire cost base or raise our charges by 50 per cent to achieve this."
Mr Hawkes added: "We have written to Sutcliffe's clients saying they are paying too much."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments