Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Good security `brings rates penalty'

Nigel Cope
Monday 13 February 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Small businesses that protect their premises with security devices end up being hammered by higher rates because their properties are deemed to be more valuable. The claim comes from the Federation of Small Businesses, which is launching a campaign today to force changes in the 1994 Valuation for Rating Regulations.

The row over business rates is the latest in a series of criticisms of the Uniform Business Rate, which is likely to impose sharply higher bills on businesses outside the South-east because commercial rents, on which the rates are based, have risen since the last revaluation five years ago.

Business tenants in the South have also launched a strong attack on a planned transitional relief scheme, which means that reductions in their bills forecast because rents have fallen over the past five years will not be passed on in full.

John Harris, the federation's chairman, said it was absurd that shopkeepers who fitted shutters or security cameras on their premises to combat burglars and ram raiders, should then be penalised for it.

"Why should people have to pay additional tax when all they are doing is trying to combat crime?", he said.

"It shows that the whole system of rating is fundamentally flawed. Most of these figures are just `lick your finger and stick it in the air' valuations anyway."

The federation is encouraging small businesses to contact their MPs and push for security measures to be excluded from the rates valuations.

The new ratings are due to come into effect from the beginning of April, replacing the 1989 valuations.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in