GEC bides time as doubts rise over BAe bid for VSEL
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BRITISH Aerospace faces an uphill battle to convince the City of the logic of its proposed bid for VSEL, the Trident submarine builder.
Analysts were becoming increasingly sceptical about the plan as speculation grew in some quarters yesterday that the General Electric Company was preparing a cash bid for VSEL. However, the stock market appeared to discount the likelihood of a bid battle by marking VSEL shares down 18p to pounds 12.10.
BAe is understood to be negotiating to buy the shipbuilder in an agreed deal that would be worth no more than pounds 12 per share. Most analysts believe the company is worth between pounds 12 and pounds 13 a share.
Talks between BAe and VSEL are likely to continue for at least another week, and sources indicated that they would be called off if BAe could not agree a satisfactory price. City analysts, meanwhile, were cautious about the strategic value of the deal to either company.
'The industrial logic is not overwhelming,' Keith Hodgkinson of Lehman Brothers said. 'It could produce some benefits, but it is not the perfect solution.'
BAe believes that VSEL would strengthen its position as a prime contractor in defence projects, bringing benefits to both companies. However, some analysts said the most obvious benefit to BAe would be purely financial because of the pounds 250m of net cash in VSEL, which is likely to rise to more than pounds 400m over the next few years as the Trident programme comes to an end. 'The strategic fit between the two companies is pretty tenuous,' Nick Judge of NatWest Securities said.
Although BAe makes naval missile systems, most observers see no obvious fit between its other businesses and VSEL.
GEC, with its pounds 1bn cash pile, would be in a position to offer a more attractive cash deal to VSEL shareholders at more than pounds 12 a share, valuing the company at about pounds 500m. The Ministry of Defence might object to such a deal because, with its Yarrow shipyard, GEC would have a monopoly of naval shipbuilding.
'It's evenly balanced whether GEC will bid,' Mr Hodgkinson said.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments