Gallaher allegations hit UK tobacco firms
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MORE THAN pounds 186m was wiped off the value of the two biggest British tobacco groups yesterday after allegations emerged over the weekend that Gallaher, supplier of brands such as Benson & Hedges and Silk Cut, knew smoking caused cancer almost 30 years ago.
Shares in Gallaher fell 19p to 335p and Imperial Tobacco's stock gave up 10.5p to 401.5p amid fears that the documents would increase the chance of successful litigation against the two tobacco giants.
Anti-smoking campaigners claimed an internal confidential memo from Gallaher's former general manager of research to its managing director proved the group knew smoking caused cancer as far back as 1970. The research executive concluded that independent research using beagles in the late 1960s "proves beyond all reasonable doubt the causation of lung cancer by smoke" and that the research "would appear to remove the controversy regarding the causation of the majority of human lung cancer."
Leigh Day, the solicitors representing 52 lung cancer victims in their bid for compensation from Gallaher and Imperial, said yesterday the new evidence significantly raised the chances of mounting a successful legal claim against the industry. "The tobacco companies have always maintained that there is no proven link between smoking and cancer. This blows their defence out of the window," said a spokeswoman for the firm. "This is only one of many documents that will surface over the next few months that will strengthen our case," she added.
Gallaher hit back at the claims, saying the memo had simply been an initial reaction to the research and that it was later discounted by the company after being heavily criticised in the scientific community.
A Gallaher spokesman said: "Our position is that the link between smoking and cancer has not been proved, although we agree that smoking is a risk factor and that statistics show that if you smoke you are more likely to get certain diseases,"
"We have of course been aware of the existence of this memo and its publication now does nothing to change our confidence in our ability to defend ourselves against litigation," he added
Clive Bates, director of anti-smoking group Action on Smoking and Health (ASH), said: "This is the great beauty of litigation - their internal documents show what they really knew and how they behaved, and their top executives have to take the stand under oath. Litigation means the truth does actually come out and the PR waffle gets taken to pieces."
The next stage in the UK action by lung cancer victims will take place on 3 April when a judge will be named for the case. The full trial is now expected to take place next year, after the claimants recently won the right to fight on under a no-win, no-fee agreement with their solicitors.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments