'Gagged' Imro chief free to talk to MPs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NIC CICUTTI
The chief executive of the investment managers' watchdog, Imro, appeared yesterday to have won his battle to give evidence to MPs on the state of financial services regulation.
An emergency meeting of the board of Imro, the Investment Management Regulatory Organization, agreed to allow Phillip Thorpe and the watchdog's chairman, Charles Nunneley, to attend a further meeting of the Treasury Select Committee, if summoned. The board's meeting follows a decision by the select committee to launch an inquiry into whether Mr Thorpe was gagged by Mr Nunneley when he appeared before its members last week.
Sir Thomas Arnold MP, chairman of the committee, has written a personal letter to Mr Thorpe asking him to comment on allegations that he felt his job would be under threat if he answered its questions fully. He also wants Mr Thorpe to expand on the Imro submission to the committee, first revealed in the Independent, in which the regulatory effectiveness of the Securities and Investments Board, the City's senior watchdog, was called into question.
An Imro spokeswoman said yesterday Mr Thorpe would be replying to Sir Thomas, indicating his willingness to attend with Mr Nunneley, and would be "answering questions without any reservations".
Board members yesterdaybacked their original criticism of the SIB and said they were giving their full support to both men but refused to elaborate.
One board member, who refused to be named, said: "Some of us felt it was regrettable this whole thing should have come out the way it did. But we have the highest respect for Phillip and what he has done for Imro after the Maxwell scandal. We would not want to lose him."
Comment, above
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments