FSA move in double trouble
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Financial Services Authority, the new super regulator, may face the disruption of moving into temporary accommodation before it can enter its new premises in Canary Wharf.
Currently based in the City, in the offices of what was the Securities and Investments Board, the FSA has been made a cash offer to vacate its existing premises as soon as possible. The freehold to its current premises, in Bunhill Row, is owned by the Honourable Artillery Company. The FSA wants to sell its lease, and has been made an attractive offer for early vacation.
However, its new offices in London's Docklands will not be ready before next autumn. It would mean the agency would have to move twice.
Sources aware of the developments say no decisions have been reached yet, but it may be the FSA will have to make the double move. Any decision, however, will be thought through carefully. One possibility would be to secure space at Canary Wharf tower, which overlooks its new offices.
Staff at the agency have been approached about taking part in a consultation exercise for their views on moving twice. Some are bemused by the turn of events, and especially the offer of consultation, as it seems a straightforward choice to them that that most will prefer just the one move.
The FSA faces a dilemma between the need to reach the best terms in any commercial transaction it is involved in and its duties as a regulator. The process of making two moves could well slow down its current case load and its ability to respond swiftly to new developments. Any such accusations would carry political repercussions and would be seized on by the Tories.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments