Fringe benefits that cross borders: An international pooling system aims to cut the costs. Roger Trapp reports
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.COMPANIES of all sizes all over the world offer their employees some kind of benefits. Where they differ is in the type offered.
This is chiefly because of varying national requirements and rules. As a result, it is difficult for multinationals to achieve economies of scale.
Providing a solution to this problem is the intention of the co-operative agreement announced last week by Cigna, the US-based international employee benefits company, and Gerling Group, the Germany-based international insurance and reinsurance company. Under the alliance, they will be offering a multinational pooling system for the benefits plans of international businesses.
Cigna director John Hamblet accepts that other companies have established similar links.
But he says this arrangement is different, because businesses are offered complete flexibility in which companies they use for insurance, rather than being forced to deal with particular organisations in different countries.
Since this centralised method of doing business did not seem consistent with the way UK companies in particular made decisions, Cigna decided personnel managers in individual national operations should be able to make decisions about cover - at the same time as making the service cost-effective for the whole group.
It had considered going it alone, but decided to link up with Gerling - which is strong in areas, particularly mainland Europe, where Cigna is not.
Essentially, the system is like a profit and loss account, with premiums being paid in as income, and expenses and claims being registered as outgoings. At the end of each financial year, the account is assessed and, in most cases, a dividend paid back to the client.
Local differences are accommodated by linking local contracts to whatever is standard for the area. This also ensures that employees deal with insurers in their own countries, rather than negotiating with a single international organisation.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments