Fate of Farnell's bid decided
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.TOM STEVENSON
City Editor
The fate of Farnell's proposed pounds 1.85bn bid for Premier Industrial of the US was effectively sealed yesterday as the Prudential and Norwich Union made their final deliberations on whether to approve or vote down the deal at Thursday's extraordinary meeting.
Unlike a handful of their peers, neither insititution was prepared to say which way they had voted but both are known to have entertained serious concerns about the financial logic of the takeover. Between them they control almost 10 per cent of Farnell's shares and in a close-run vote, their decisions are likely to be highly influential.
NatWest Securities and BZW, Farnell's financial advisers, were yesterday in the thick of a frantic last minute call-round of investors to ensure they cast their votes this week. With opponents of the deal needing the support of 25 per cent of the votes cast, the company is keen to maximise the numbers of voters and so raise the hurdle the rebels must clear.
The bid for Premier, which would put Farnell on the brink of FT-SE 100 membership, has caused an unprecendented campaign by several large institutions to shoot down the deal. Both Standard Life and Legal & General have gone public over their intention to vote against the takeover, which they consider risky and overpriced.
It is extremely unusual for large funds such as these to make public their opposition to the deals proposed by companies in which they invest. Normally, disapproval is voiced privately or expressed by an investor disposing of its shares in the market.
MAM, Scottish Widows and Flemings have announced their intention to go with Farnell.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments