Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Express guide to the art of cutting inflation

Gavyn Davies
Monday 16 January 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Shortly after winning the 1970 election, Edward Heath announced cuts in indirect taxes and nationalised industry prices, saying that this would reduce inflation "at a stroke". But as many politicians have discovered there is a very big difference betweena one-off reduction in prices and a permanent drop in the rate of inflation.

By the time Mr. Heath left office his policies had pointed to 25 per cent inflation, making his at-a-stroke pledge one of the more spectacular failures in British political history. (Actually, he never quite used those exact words ,but they stuck anyway.)

A more promising way of cutting inflation with the stroke of a pen was proposed last week by Alan Greenspan, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve. He suggested that various statistical defects are responsible for a systematic over- estimate of American inflation by about 1per cent per annum. Note that this is not a one-off - if Mr Greenspan is right, then over a decade the US statisticians get the price level wrong by more than 10 per cent.

The consequences are profound. Much ink has been spilled in recent years over the failure of of growth in real wages for manual workers in the US, but if the price level is being over-stated by this amount, then real wages are being under-recorded by a similar percentage. Furthermore, social security recipients are being heavily over-compensated for the rise in prices. Many billions of dollars could be saved each year if the price level were measured more accurately.

The same would be true in the UK. If (and admittedly it is a very big if) British inflation is also underestimated by Dr. Greenspan's 1per cent per annum, the annual savings on the social security budget from correcting the error would be {M2{M00.7bn in the first year, {M2{M01.4bn in the second, etc. Since the annual saving would rise by {M2{M00.7bn each year, the Government's aim of a 20p basic rate of income tax would soon come into view.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in