Exploding the commission myth : John Edwards, a financial adviser, insists that the Treasury's move on insurance selling is good news to him
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.GREAT news. That was my first reaction, as someone who earns a living as an independent financial adviser, to the Treasury's announcement that it was going to insist on full disclosure of commission paid by insurance companies.
Crucially, the Treasury has insisted on commission disclosure by tied agents and insurance company salesmen as well as by independent advisers. This will help to explode the current myth that financial advice can be obtained for nothing if you go to the right quarters.
Independent advisers will be able to compete on equal terms. Right now, their image is dreadful - commission-crazy crooks whose advice is biased by a desire to get rich quick. By contrast, insurance company salesmen and tied agents have been able to imply that they are providing a free service. Yet they earn just as much and usually a great deal more, from hidden commission and bonuses. Soon, they will have to come clean.
Obviously there will be problems. The size of the commission earned for an apparently simple transaction will shock some people and trigger demands for some of the action. Forget about overheads, administration and the cost of providing advice earning no reward. Price competition will intensify. Perhaps there will be special sales offers - pounds 100 for an endowment policy for this month only or pounds 75 for a personal pension with XYZ Company.
The move to charging fees instead of commission will accelerate. Unfortunately, most of the public object to paying fees for advice given by people who have not qualified in the same way as accountants and solicitors, and this will limit charging, especially to poorer people.
Insurance companies may also revise the commission structure by demanding less up front, phasing it over a longer period. That may look better to customers but would be another blow to smaller firms relying on cash flow to pay their bills.
Nevertheless, I will be a happier man when full commission disclosure by everyone is introduced. It will sort out the cowboys among independent advisers. Most important, it will clear the very distorted picture now presented to the public.
The author, a former personal finance editor of the Financial Times, is now an independent financial adviser with Berry, Birch & Noble.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments