Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

EMU adds to financial markets' uncertainty

Monday 03 July 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

If John Major fails to win the convincing victory he needs in today's leadership election, the most important reason will be European monetary union. A second round will be dominated by the issue that continues to tear the Tory party apart. The contortions of the pro-European Michael Heseltine will be fascinating to watch as he bids for votes from the right.

Unless the Conservatives stage a near-miraculous recovery at the polls, however, all this will be largely irrelevant. On present form, a Labour government will have to make the fateful decision on whether or not to participate in monetary union in 1999. Yet as the Conservatives wheel ever-closer to rejecting even the "opt-out" compromise, the implications of this gathering head of steam against EMU need to be taken on board by financial markets.

Can Britain afford to stand aside if others decide to forge ahead with monetary union? Lord Lawson told a conference of top bankers yesterday that "we can and must" do just that. Basing his position on constitutional grounds - that monetary union and political union "must stand or fall together" - he said Britain could afford to go it alone. In particular, there was no reason why the City should lose its position as the financial capital of Europe and as one of the three great financial centres of the world.

By contrast, a former governor of the Bank of England, Lord Kingsdown, warned against the dangers of assuming that EMU would not happen. That was the mistake Britain had made 40 years ago in Messina before the birth of the European Community. Britain would face a severe competitive handicap if we dithered on the sidelines hoping that EMU would go away.

The argument will clearly run and run. While most still argue about the big issue, some already have their minds on the nitty gritty, which can make highly alarming reading. Speaking at the same conference, Richard Allen of Apacs, the payment clearing association, said the minimum cost of switching payments systems to a common currency will be pounds 914m. This massive enterprise will take at least three years and must be based upon "irrevocable political will".

That is something that doesn't seem thick on the ground at the moment. EMU is billed as the project to end the uncertainties that attend floating exchange rates, the crowning glory of European integration. In practice it is injecting a whole new area of uncertainty into financial markets.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in