Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Electricity firms cleared of being anti-competitive

Friday 12 November 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

OFFER, the electricity watchdog, has cleared the regional electricity companies of allegations that they cross-subsidise their retail businesses from electricity supply and distribution operations.

Its report said that in aggregate the companies made retail operating losses of more than pounds 100m over the past three years, but these were at the expense of shareholders, not consumers.

The report followed a complaint by Dixons, the high-street electrical retailer, that the companies were acting in an anti-competitive way. The Office of Fair Trading, which received the Offer report, said it did not intend to take formal action against the electricity firms.

The OFT said that no regional electricity company was significant enough in retailing to command market power, and any retail losses did not enable them to charge more for electricity. However, Sir Bryan Carsberg, director-general of the OFT, said he wanted all the companies to publish their retail accounts separately and he intended to monitor the situation.

Roger Salmons, of Dixons, was disappointed that Offer had not decided to take action, but said the report vindicated his company's complaint.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in