Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Drinks firms fight Schweppes deal

Nigel Cope Associate City Editor
Monday 18 January 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

SEVERAL OF Britain's leading soft drinks companies have complained to the Office of Fair Trading that Cadbury Schweppes's proposed pounds 1bn deal to sell its non-US soft drinks interests to Coca-Cola is anti-competitive.

Submissions have been filed by Britvic, which is part of Bass, Virgin, which controls the Virgin Cola brand, and the Scottish group AG Barr, which produces Irn-Bru. They argue that the deal would give Coca-Cola 50 per cent of the UK soft drinks market and be against consumer interests.

Stephen Davies, managing director of Britvic, said: "We have genuine concerns. Coca-Cola is already the dominant player and they would be acquiring another major slice of the market. It is the augmentation of a monopoly position."

Robin Barr, chairman of AG Barr, said: "It will substantially increase the clout of the company that is already the leader by some distance. That has to be wrong. We hope the OFT will take the same view."

Under the deal, announced in December, Cadbury is selling its non-US soft drinks to Coca-Cola in order to concentrate on its confectionery interests and its US soft drinks business, chiefly Dr Pepper.

The brands included in the deal are Schweppes, Dr Pepper, Canada Dry Crush and Oasis, in 120 countries. Coca-Cola's portfolio already includes Coca-Cola, Lilt, Sprite and Fanta.

Figures from AC Nielsen show that the UK take-home drinks sector was worth pounds 3.4bn last year. Estimates suggest that Coca-Cola has 40 per cent of the market, Britvic 20 per cent, AG Barr 6 per cent and Virgin 2 per cent.

Companies such as Britvic say gaining the Schweppes brands will take Coca-Cola's share to over 50 per cent, potentially restricting customer choice. It claims that Coca-Cola will be able to use the power of the "must-have" Coca-Cola brand to persuade retailers to stock its other brands as well, potentially excluding other products from retailers' shelves.

Britvic also says that the latest in a series of deals between Cadbury and Coca-Cola amounts to "acquisition by stealth". They formed a bottling joint venture, Coca-Cola Schweppes Beverages, in 1987. In 1996 Cadbury sold its 51 per cent stake in CCSB to Coca-Cola. Now the US giant is taking control of the Schweppes brands. Rivals say the "drip-feed" nature of the deals has enabled them to evade scrutiny by the competition authorities.

Cadbury says that as Coca-Cola already controls bottling and distribution of Schweppes brands in the UK, the latest change is a minor development.

Competitors had until 29 December to make submissions to the OFT, which is expected to make a decision next month.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in