Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Davies warns over downsizing

Roger Trapp
Tuesday 23 July 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Howard Davies, deputy governor of the Bank of England, yesterday added his voice to the growing criticism of "downsizing".

Mr Davies, a former director general of the Confederation of British Industry, told the Institute of Management's annual companions lunch in London that in following US companies down this road, "we may have backed ourselves into a corner". In particular, there was a "danger of communicating mixed and confusing statements".

Every company said its employees were its greatest asset, "but when the chips were down" it readily reduced the size of those resources, he added. That confusion was not likely to create the state of mind that would bring the improved performance being sought.

The problem stemmed from what he believed were several generally accepted but conflicting principles. Among these was the realisation that the changing business environment had created a need for different skills and the end of the cradle-to-grave employment contract, and the idea that meeting the obligation to train employees gave most companies a loyal and more productive workforce.

Stephen Roach, the Wall Street economist whose change of mind over downsizing initiated the current debate, had asked whether the resurgence in productivity had put too great a strain on employees and could lead to a labour backlash. That could happen here, he said.

Pointing out that legislative interference in such matters did not generally work, he said companies should be looking to develop their employees to give them "lifelong employability if not employment". Certain companies, such as Unipart, with its internal "university", were moving in this direction.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in