Croda puts cosmetics up for sale
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Croda, the Humberside chemicals group, has put its cosmetics and toiletries business up for sale after the business dived into loss last year.
The news marred the announcement of record profits from the group, ahead of exceptional items, for 1994. Pre-tax profits rose 6.7 per cent to £39.8m, on turnover up from £415m to £423m.
Croda chief executive Keith Hopkins said 20 to 30 per cent increases in packaging prices and higher prices for other raw materials had turned the cosmetics operation into "a disaster area".
The business, which makes own-label products for the big supermarkets and does contract manufacture for overseas, has been unable to pass on the soaring costs, turning a £1.7m profit in 1993 into a loss of £700,000. Mr Hopkins said: "We have a number of interested parties looking at that and we hope to dispose of it later this year."
For the group, earnings per share fell from 27.6p to 22.9p. A final dividend of 5.8p raises the annual total to 8.9p.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments