Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Court frees Revenue to pursue Glaxo

Magnus Grimond
Friday 10 November 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

MAGNUS GRIMOND

Glaxo Wellcome yesterday lost a legal judgment in favour of the Inland Revenue, which is now free to pursue the company for hundreds of millions of pounds of back tax.

However, the drugs giant said the High Court ruling was only on procedural issues and was not indicative of a tax liability on the company's part.

The company has already made substantial provisions, estimated to be up to pounds 400m, against an unfavourable outcome of the case.

A spokesman said: "The judge was quite clear. He made no judgment on Glaxo's liability to corporation tax."

The case was brought by Glaxo to test certain issues surrounding transfer pricing, in particular whether the Inland Revenue was allowed to review transactions by group companies prior to 30 June 1986. Transfer pricing is a technique used to "move" profits from a country with high corporate taxation to one with lower taxes.

A spokeswoman for the Inland Revenue said: "Obviously we're pleased we won - the fact that we won would seem to suggest we've been right in the way we've applied the law for the last 40 years." She said the parties were discussing dates for appeal hearings.

The case dates from issues stretching back to before 1980 and is not expected to hit profits this year. Although Glaxo Wellcome shares fell 18p to 857p yesterday, part of that related to disappointment over Wednesday's research briefing by the company.

Comment, page 21

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in