Court deals setback to Lloyd's names
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE COURT of Appeal yesterday dealt a blow to a group of Lloyd's names seeking compensation for losses in the insurance market, writes Diane Coyle.
In a majority decision it ruled that they had failed to bring actions against the Outhwaite syndicates and members' agencies within a six-year deadline stipulated by the Limitations Act, 1980.
The names argued that deliberate concealment of facts about asbestos-related insurance after the contracts were written in 1982 should have stopped the clock on the statute of limitations.
The group of about 500 names did not sue until April 1992. Other groups intending to sue for damages had hoped to rely on allegations of concealment to get over the limitations hurdle. The Outhwaite group has been given leave to appeal to the House of Lords.
Nicholas Edgell, a solicitor at Norton Rose acting for the names, said: 'It is a setback, but I don't accept that we are dead in the water as a result of this judgment.'
There were other aspects to the case, but it would not proceed before a House of Lords judgment.
Simon Roper, of the solicitors Oswald Hickson Collier, acting for the members' agents, said: 'I think this decision will knock the stuffing out of them, although they do make other claims.'
If the second group does appeal the Lords would probably hear the case quite soon.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments