Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Court deals blow to insurers in America

Larry Black
Friday 19 August 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

NEW YORK - Property and casualty insurers active in the United States have suffered a serious blow with this week's decision by California's Supreme Court upholding the state's controversial caps on profit margins, writes Larry Black.

The court unexpectedly ruled that the 10 per cent cap and a dollars 1bn customer rebate imposed by the state in 1991 were both constitutional.

The regulations, fiercely opposed by the insurance industry, were the result of a 1988 referendum in California on soaring car and property insurance premiums.

None of the UK firms active there - notably the Farmers subsidiary of BAT, General Accident and Royal Insurance - was directly affected by the ruling, either having been exempted from the 20 per cent rate rollback in 1991, or having reached a settlement with the state's insurance commissioner.

'We've never received a rollback order, and believe our rates have always been fair,' John Millen, a spokesman for Farmers Group in Los Angeles, said.

'The danger with this ruling is that this means they can now issue more (rollbacks).'

Analysts say the decision will almost certainly encourage similar measures in other American states. Some 13 states now have elected insurance commissioners on the Californian model.

'They are almost certainly anticipating demands for similar rollbacks from their constituents,' said Jack Snyder, vice-president of AM Best, an insurance industry rating agency.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in