Consumer group attacks EC bank charter
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BRUSSELS - Europe's leading consumer organisation attacked the European Commission yesterday over a controversial charter intended to give consumers in the Community a better deal when they transfer money abroad, writes Tim Jackson.
BEUC, the Brussels-based European consumers' organisation, claimed that banks' foreign exchange operations are flouting both government recommendations and their own voluntary codes of conduct when changing money from one EC currency to another.
The group said two-thirds of banks and one-third of bureaux de change surveyed across the Community failed to display either exchange rates or commissions for changing travellers' cheques, while consumers were also kept uninformed on the real cost of changing money and buying goods in foreign currencies with credit cards.
Laura Mosca, the BEUC's chief economist, dismissed the User's Charter, published in March by Sir Leon Brittan, the EC's Competition Commissioner. She complained that the charter, intended to make European banks improve their cross-border service without legislation, imposed no legal obligations on the banks and gave consumers no means of enforcing it. 'Only binding measures can effectively remedy this situation,' she said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments