Compensation scheme faces funds crisis
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NIC CICUTTI
The Investors Compensation Scheme, which helps victims of fraud and poor advice, is operating on a hand-to-mouth basis after a decision not to use its pounds 10m bank overdraft facility.
ICS directors have decided not to add to their existing pounds 1.5m overdraft with Royal Bank of Scotland until they hear whether a legal challenge by Sun Life Assurance will proceed. There is uncertainty about their inflow of funds, as the compensation scheme's largest single funding body, the Personal Investment Authority - which was to have issued a pounds 16m cash call on the companies it regulates - decided this week not to do so until the same legal challenge was resolved. As a result, the ICS is dependent on one-off inflows of money from other regulators and occasional indemnity refunds for payments already made.
Unless the application from Sun Life for a judicial review of its legal obligations towards the compensation scheme is refused by the courts, the ICS will become insolvent within a few months. The insurer's application centres on whether it should have to pay compensation on behalf of firms that went bust before they joined the PIA last year. It argues that it could be held liable by its policyholders for making illegal payments.
Both the compensation scheme and the Securities and Investments Board, the City's leading regulator, have written to the Treasury informing it of the looming crisis. They want the Treasury or the Bank of England to act as a guarantor on the ICS's behalf so that payments can continue if the judicial review goes ahead.
Senior Treasury officials have told them this is an issue that must be resolved between the various parties involved.
David Cresswell, investor relations manager at the ICS, said yesterday: "We have enough funds available to meet the existing offers we have made. We are awaiting the outcome of the judicial review application. If Sun Life's application is granted, the options we are faced with will crystallise quite rapidly."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments