Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Comparisons in the generation game

Tuesday 07 February 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

If there is one area where competition seems to be really effective in the electricity industry, it is the setting of dividends. Investors were treated yesterday to the sight of PowerGen and National Power vying for the largest increase, with NP winning hands down with a promise of 24 per cent. There was much speculation about their motives, and even a suggestion that the discrepancy in the payout was part of an uninentional muddle. Both companies are planning share buybacks on a similar scale, so that does not explain the difference. It is also hard to justify on performance grounds alone.

One theory was that National Power was simply reacting to PowerGen's glossier image among investors by stealing a march on the dividend front.

On most grounds, the two companies' long-term prospects are equally attractive. The generosity of the dividends confirms, as if proof were needed, the power firms' ability to rake in money from a semi-protected market, whose price regime has conspicuously failed to set enough of a market discipline.

The regulator, Professor Stephen Littlechild, is attempting to tighten up, by pressing for the sale of some power plants and by belatedly having another go at prices charged to customers. Lurking in the background is the threat of a reference to the Monopolies Commission if he finds there is not enough will to change.

But it would take several years for the impact of a reference to work through.

In the meantime, the power companies are discovering that high dividends now overcome a lot of their investors fears about the future.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in