Company defence
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Littlewoods, the privately owned retail group, last night clarified its position in the legal wrangle which has pitted the company against Prodip Guha, its former deputy chief executive.
Mr Guha, who left the Liverpool-based group last October, is suing the company for racial discrimination and wrongful dismissal. Littlewoods says that these proceedings will be "vigorously defended."
Mr Guha left without compensation last year after what has been described as a boardroom coup. The company said yesterday that this was "utter rubbish". In an attempt to underline the board's unity, the Littlewoods' statement was signed by the top three directors, Leonard van Geest, chairman , Barry Dale, chief executive, and John Moores, a director.
Recent press speculation regarding the incident has prompted Littlewoods to elaborate saying that Mr Guha was suspended last October and that a number of complaints were made against him. These included that he had met a journalist without the prior permission of the board which was contrary to instructions.
A further complaint suggested he had deliberately misled or attempted to mislead fellow directors.
Mr Guha's supporters say he has only taken legal action after being "stonewalled" by the company for months. His supporters also allege that Littlewoods has waged a campaign against him since he left the company and that Mr Guha was denied legal representation at meetings to discuss his departure. Littlewoods' statement states that after "a fair and proper consideration of the facts", Mr Guha was dismissed for gross misconduct.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments