Commentary: Long on ideals, short on ideas
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.About 70 life insurance training and compliance officers had the misfortune to gather at a London conference yesterday to hear industry bigwigs exchange their latest tired shots over the future of investor protection. You have heard it all before: what we need is higher standards of advice, better disclosure of charges and a simpler regulatory system. Yes, yes - but when are we going to get them?
Justice, the law reform group, today publishes its blueprint for the protection of the small investor. Justice's committee of inquiry came to the following earth-shattering conclusions: investors should have access to 'sound, reliable expert advice; honest, accurate, informative and reliable . . . promotional literature; an effective and speedy compensation system . . . ; a clear, comprehensive, straightforward and easily understandable regulatory structure'. Brilliant. But how are we to get to the promised land?
The arguments over the Personal Investment Authority - the body proposed to take on the job of protecting retail investors, replacing Fimbra and Lautro - is dragging on after many months. Andrew Large, chairman of the Securities and Investments Board, told the conference that the SIB wants the PIA to become the single regulator for the retail investment industry and is confident this will happen. He can only be that confident if he intends to compel the financial advisers, life insurers and banks to join the PIA.
Mr Large said the SIB will supervise the PIA to ensure it carries out its role. This two-tier structure is unnecessary - its only possible purpose is to sustain the myth of self-regulation, which will disappear anyway with Mr Large's insistence that a majority of the PIA board be public interest representatives.
A bit more compulsion would be welcome. Mr Large should cut short the debate and make a few decisions.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments