Commentary: Homing in on surplus offices
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The idea of converting some of London's 20 million sq ft of empty office space into homes is becoming a reality. In 1990 there was not a single planning application for such conversions. Last year there were 93, and now there are six a week.
The logic is compelling because the commercial market is even more dire than the residential one. An analysis of the central London office pipeline published yesterday* suggests that only a tenth of the sites with planning permission will be developed within the next five years, and that half will never be worth developing.
Add in some of the 20 million sq ft of unlet office space, and you have potential accommodation for students (and student nurses), the homeless, and those who want to live in central London and save on the cost and strain of commuting.
The equation makes so much sense that the Department of the Environment is urging councils to allow changes of use. But the process has a long way to go. Banks and developers are often unwilling to admit that their dreams of office development will never be realised. Planning committees, especially in inner London boroughs, are proving inflexible or even hostile.
Moreover, the finances of such schemes are often marginal: so the fact that conversions have to pay VAT, whereas new construction is zero-rated, is an obstacle. But the biggest boost would be if the Treasury worked out that an office-to-family-flat conversion, costing pounds 50,000, could save pounds 13,000 a year in bed and breakfast accommodation. Anyone for more homes at less cost?
*The Home-Office Report. Publishing Business Ltd, 27 John Adam St, London WC2N 6HX. pounds 35.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments