Sports Direct's policeman has built quite a rap sheet
Outlook
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Institutional investors haven’t always been terribly receptive to the ideas of the trade union movement. On the subject of Sports Direct, it might be in their interests to find some common ground.
The unions’ share-ownership arm wants chairman Keith Hellawell voted out. That’s understandable, you might think, given the company’s longstanding, and lamentable, use of zero-hours contracts for a large part of its workforce and its cavalier behaviour when part of subsidiary USC went under leading to 200 workers being laid off with just 15 minutes’ notice.
But the problems with Mr Hellawell go well beyond this.
Sports Direct has been repeatedly involved in governance controversies, ranging from its eccentric moves in the stock market taking minority stakes in other businesses, to its attempts to hand bucketloads of free shares to the founder, deputy chairman and controlling investor Mike Ashley. When it comes to governance Mr Hellawell, a former policeman, is acquiring quite a rap sheet.
At its core, Sports Direct is a superb business that serves its customers well. It would have little difficulty both treating its employees better and steering clear of the controversies it keeps wading into.
A stronger, more effective chairman might help there to the benefit of all, including Mr Ashley. Rule changes mean minority investors have the power to throw out the non-executive directors of companies with powerful controlling shareholders. They should make use of it.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments