Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Sports Direct cutting off its nose to spite its face with retail investments

The company's stakes in troubled department stores battered its profits

James Moore
Chief Business Commentator
Thursday 19 July 2018 10:35 BST
Comments
Sports Direct boss Mike Ashley
Sports Direct boss Mike Ashley (PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The scandals over worker treatment have abated for now, so the focus is back on the performance of Sports Direct’s business. Oh dear.

The “Selfridges of Sport” today reported a 72.5 per cent slump in profits for the year ending April 29, as its founder and boss Mike Ashley’s eccentric habit of buying up bits of other retailers – he has a bit of a thing for department stores – came back to bite his investors.

Sports Direct is the biggest shareholder in Debenhams, with nearly 30 per cent of the stock, and is also an investor in House of Fraser.

They are two department store chains Selfridges bosses must look at and think ‘phew, thank goodness we’re not them’.

The former has been a dog. Its collapsing share price wasn’t the sole reason for Sports Direct’s profits slump, and last year’s numbers were flattered by the sale of the Dunlop brand. But it played a big role.

House of Fraser meanwhile, is undergoing a painful restructuring that will see thousands of jobs lost. As a business it’s also going ‘woof’.

Sports Direct’s little loved chairman Keith Hellawell sought to defend the company’s portfolio of retail stakes as “innovative strategic partnerships” that will “help to differentiate our offering”.

Right now they aren’t doing that in a good way.

The company is a sports retailer with a retail special situations fund tacked on. The latter part is dragging the former down.

I’ve mocked Mr Ashley’s “Selfridges of Sport” concept in the past, because it’s a bit silly and suggests Sports Direct is suffering from an inferiority complex. Why not simply talk about how you’re elevating Sports Direct and be proud of the brand you’ve created, rather than piggybacking on someone else’s?

Moving the business upmarket seems to be working. Lee Wild, head of equity strategy at Interactive Investor, said the concept was doing “better than expected” and other analysts have said similar things.

The firm’s UK and European retail estate had a difficult year, reporting falls of 2 and 0.1 per cent in revenues, respectively. But underlying profits before tax were strongly ahead – up more than a third – and the group continues to expand at a rapid pace in the rest of the world.

It may pain some to admit it, but Mr Ashley is a very good retailer, and the core Sports Direct is a very good business that’s holding its own in an extremely difficult retail climate.

Trouble is, Mr Ashley is also exceptionally good at cutting off his nose to spite his face, and those retail investments that “differentiate” Sports Direct are doing the same to his company.

“A big slump in annual profit at Sports Direct suggests the business should stick to its core skills,” said broker AJ Bell. I expect Mr Ashley and his team regularly hear variations on that theme, because it makes an awful lot of sense. Just imagine what the business could be if it did.

I wouldn’t bank on Mr Ashley listening, however.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in