Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Simon English: It's about time we called the bankers' bluff

Simon English
Friday 10 February 2012 01:00 GMT
0Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Outlook You don't have to agree with any aspect of The Spectator's politics to find it an entertaining read.

It's funny, forthright, and sparkily written.

But when it comes to banking, unless the author is the estimable Martin Vander Weyer, you can bet it will make a hash of it.

The lead editorial in last week's issue (headed Bank withdrawals) is pretty typical.

The approach is the usual one: to assume banking is an entrepreneurial field and that being anti-bank is the same as being anti-business.

Banking is not business. It's just banking. It is perfectly possible to revere one and find the other dysfunctional.

A man that starts a business from scratch, deals with the endless frustrations that follow and turns his venture into a company that he sells for £100m is to be admired.

There is no correlation between this man and a bank chief executive.

Worrying far too much, the magazine reports: "Executives at the very top of Barclays are beginning to wonder whether any bank should base itself in Britain." They are not. It is a game they play, a bluff we should start calling. They all do it.

Deutsche Bank sometimes threatens to leave Germany. JPMorgan hints it might decamp from America. Where do these guys imagine they are heading? Do they pass each other at the airport with a confused look on their faces? Where the hell are you going? Can I have your parking space?

Few places are friendlier to bankers than London. And if you think moving house is a pain, try moving a bank for a marginal tax benefit. Banks don't move jurisdiction very often, especially since they tend to need a government bailout every once in a while. And there are many many good reasons for being based in London aside from the prevailing tax rate, not least that everyone else is.

s.english@independent.co.uk

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

0Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in