Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

SFO inquiry into Barclays could turn into yet another costly disaster

 

James Moore
Monday 12 May 2014 16:13 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

OUTLOOK: The Serious Fraud Office’s inquiry into Barclays’ Middle Eastern fund raising is getting, well, serious.

Reeling from the ignominious collapse of its investigation into the property mogul Tchenguiz family, combined with budget cuts and several senior departures, the agency is in desperate need of a win.

Hence the effort being put into Barclays.

If my sources are correct, the SFO is throwing everything, including the kitchen sink and the instant coffee served to defendants, at this one.

In addition to its plans to quiz former chief executives John Varley and Bob Diamond, it has interviewed Roger Jenkins, once the head of the bank’s tax planning unit. Former finance director Chris Lucas is on this list too, in addition to everyone from the former general counsel to the woman who brought the tea and biscuits in when they were holding meetings.

Superficially you can see whey the Barclays case might look like an attractive target.

Wealthy bankers are not exactly held in high public esteem right now. Historically the size, length and complexity of fraud trials has made it difficult to secure convictions, and with enough scrutiny over enough time directed at prosecution cases “reasonable doubt” is almost inevitably established.

The scales of justice might just tip back in a prosecutor’s favour if the defendants come from a profession whose members are about on the level of MPs who cheat on their expenses in terms of the public esteem in which they are held.

Moreover if the SFO could secure a conviction of a senior banker - or any banker - for events during the financial crisis, that would be far more than any other authority in this country has achieved. All the Financial Services Authority could manage was to ban two executives from the City who already out of the game, while fining one of them (Peter Cummings) £500,000.

But the SFO is playing a dangerous game here. Those it is pursuing have the means and motivation to fight very hard against it. Any case would turn into a war that might make the year long £40m Blue Arrow fraud trial in 1992 look like a minor skirmish. That, you may remember, was labelled a “costly disaster” by the Appeal Court when it set aside the convictions of the defendants.

The Financial Conduct Authority has also been involved in the case. It would like to fine Barclays £50m over the Qatari cash call, but a dust up between the two of them is on hold until the SFO is finished with any criminal proceedings.

Operating under a civil regime, the FCA has also been looking at individuals. That’s significant because it only has to prove its case “on the balance of probabilities”.

Given that together with its previous record, the SFO might, on the balance of probabilities, have been better advised to leave its fellow agency in the driving seat.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in