Poundland deal would force supermarkets to take notice
There’s something perverse about the Competition and Markets Authority’s decision to block Poundland’s attempted takeover of 99p Stores
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.There’s something perverse about the Competition and Markets Authority’s decision to block Poundland’s attempted takeover of 99p Stores.
For a start, officials seems to have put Poundland in a very narrow box labelled “single-price discounters”, claiming its only competition following the merger would be Poundworld.
But surely Poundland’s battles are equally fierce with supermarket convenience stores, where it competes on milk and crisp prices; Boots and Superdrug where it competes on baby wipes and cotton buds; and Currys PC World where it competes on wires and cables to charge our plethora of gadgets at home. And that’s just the start of it.
Yet the CMA seem to think shoppers will be disadvantaged by the idea that if they can’t find that tube of toothpaste at Poundland they will only be satisfied when they find another pound shop to buy it from.
Poundland has been one of the few big success stories to emerge from the recession – along with Aldi and Lidl – and has managed to win over large swathes of middle class shoppers in the process.
And while some might argue that pound shops are a blight on the high street, and a sign of the downturn, at least with Poundland Jim McCarthy and his team have created a business that isn’t completely devoid of character or more akin to a jumble sale of unwanted garden gnomes or meerkat porch lights.
The CMA also appears to have missed the benefits shoppers could feel from an even bigger Poundland empire. For example, the company would be able to push a harder bargain with suppliers to bring prices down, so instead of getting three Mr Kipling cakes in a pack, we could start getting four for a quid.
And, in turn, wouldn’t that force the supermarkets to sit up and take notice?
If I can buy my favourite shampoo at Poundland, instead of £1.90 at a supermarket, shouldn’t that help push prices lower across the high street, especially in convenience stores where prices are typically higher?
The CMA seem caught up on the single-price point, but is completely missing the bigger picture. Poundland, as a listed company, can be held to account far more easily that the hotchpotch of pound shops that went before it.
And if they, in turn, can hold established rivals on the high street to account on their prices, then the consumer and everyone else wins.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments