Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

OUTLOOK: Justin King was right on taxes... Just because it isn't illegal, doesn't mean it's acceptable

 

Ben Chu
Monday 03 February 2014 17:10 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

What was so striking about last year’s call by the Sainsbury’s chief executive, Justin King, for firms to demonstrate some “morality” over corporation tax payments was that he broke ranks with his fellow bosses on the subject.

What was so striking about last year’s call by the Sainsbury’s chief executive, Justin King, for firms to demonstrate some “morality” over corporation tax payments was that he broke ranks with his fellow bosses on the subject.

The heads of large businesses like to give the impression they are in relentless competition with each other, but the truth is that it’s a conservative and crony-ish world. King defied the corporate conventional wisdom in tax, which holds that if behaviour isn’t illegal, then it’s acceptable.

It’s a shame, in that context, to learn, thanks to The Independent, that the supermarket’s incoming boss, Mike Coupe, invested in a film partnership scheme with tax advantages. Sainsbury’s has pointed out that film investment tax breaks were promoted by the last Government. Others have argued there’s no difference between putting money into these funds and sheltering money from the taxman through an ISA.

Except the tax authorities evidently don’t think so. They have shut down some of these schemes and keep a close eye on the rest.  Wouldn’t any sensible person in the public eye look at film partnership funds and hear warning sirens?

Should a distinction be drawn between personal tax decisions, like that of Mr Coupe, and those related to corporate tax? Most people would say that morality cannot be so neatly separated. In the end, Mr King put it best: “You can’t claim to hold a trustworthy space on any issue by just saying ‘I’m operating within the law’ ”.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in