Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Baroness Morgan says she has been dumped by the Conservatives as chair of Ofsted because they are keen to stuff quangos with their friends and donors.
I leave to others more expert than me to decide whether she’s got a case or not. But when it comes to the Bank of England’s Financial Policy Committee (FPC) I think there’s pretty strong evidence of this kind of behaviour going on.
Last year the impressive City veteran Robert Jenkins was turned down for a permanent position on the watchdog by George Osborne. One of the Chancellor’s replacement appointees was Richard Sharp, a former Goldman Sachs banker who has also personally donated around £400,000 to the Tory Party.
And how has that switch worked out? It would be fair to say that Mr Sharp has had a low-key start on the FPC. Since taking up his position last April he has not made a single public speech.
Compare that to the five made by Mr Jenkins in his first year in the job. When this dearth of output was pointed out to Mr Sharp at a recent Treasury Select Committee hearing the former Goldman man spluttered that he didn’t want to give the impression of disagreement on the FPC.
It was left to the chair, Andrew Tyrie, to point out, gently, to Mr Sharp that he was appointed precisely to air in public his expert views on financial regulation. Or was Mr Sharp given a different brief, in private, when he was given the job by Mr Osborne?
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments