Nick Goodway: Teenagers move markets, so the all-new New Look had better stay well clear
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook Three years ago my then teenage daughters helped to scupper New Look's planned stock market flotation. I had applied the highly scientific Dad's credit card test. Choose a store, enter it when it opened on a Saturday morning and rendezvous with your Pater at the checkout 30 minutes later.
Primark won hands down (they were much younger then). New Look barely made a small dent on the credit card balance.
New Look's owners – the private equity firms Apax and Permira, alongside its founder, Tom Singh – wisely decided in February 2012 not to go ahead with an initial public offering that could have valued it at a staggering £1.7bn.
I, unwisely, failed to follow through the experiment and so did not buy shares in Primark's owner, Associated British Foods, which have since doubled in price.
Anyway, to the present, and New Look has a new look. In fact several.
It has new management with the chief executive Anders Kristiansen, a Dane newly arrived from Chinese retailing.
It has that new look (I can't help the puns), or, as the management prefers to say, it has "concept stores". To be precise, about 170 of the 590 UK shops have been refurbished. And management (the new one) says they are trading much better than the old ones.
It has new financing. A successful bond issue in May pushed the debt maturity out to 2018 and net debt is steady at £1.1bn. That debt, and the plan to pay it down, was another reason the 2010 share issue was scuppered.
And New Look even seems to have traded well through the bizarre weather we have experienced since April. It needed fewer sales with less stock and entered July's summer heatwave at a storming pace, with dresses and skirts flying off the rails.
Best of all New Look reinforced the point that an initial public offering is not on the cards for at least this year and probably several years to come.
Buoyed by the new management's enthusiasm, I returned to the younger daughter for her views, via BBM, natch.
"Cheap shoes," she opened positively. "Everything else just looks crap to me."
"No idea why they spent so much money on their Oxford Street store just to look like Topshop but allow the Brent Cross branch to look cheaper than Primark." Ouch.
And the dresses and skirts? "Poorly designed and poorly made. " So not a fan? "Last place I would shop even after Primark."
While these views are not necessarily those of the author of this column, it would make a lot of sense for New Look to remain in private hands for a while longer.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments