Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Nick Goodway: Savers lose out with Funding for Lending

Nick Goodway
Thursday 31 January 2013 00:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Outlook First of all quantitative easing hit pensioners because the surge of gilt purchases by the Bank of England created a sharp rise in annuity prices. That meant people about to retire faced much lower potential incomes than they had expected.

Now savers are being hit by the Bank's Funding for Lending scheme. Oh yes, the latest numbers show it definitely had a beneficial effect on home-buyers, with more money available at slightly lower rates for mortgages. But the same Bank of England data also revealed that in December the average interest offered on new savings accounts fell by 0.2 per cent to just 2.11 per cent. That is the lowest rate since the end of the financial crisis in 2009, and way behind the cost of living as measured by the CPI at 2.7 per cent.

No wonder that the man who signs the bank notes, Andrew Bailey, noting that savers' rates have come down far more sharply than borrowers', suggested "the jury is still out on whether we have seen as much adjustment as we ought to see".

Well the jury needn't stay out too much longer. It is pretty clear the banks are using cheap money to bolster profits at the expense of pensioners and savers. Perhaps Mr Bailey should check with his boss, Sir Mervyn King, who in July joins the country's army of pensioners. Except, of course, Sir Mervyn is one of those lucky folk still on a final salary pension, which will pay him just over £200,000 a year.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in