Mark Leftly: The High Speed 2 rail link still carries too much baggage
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Westminster Outlook The Public Accounts Committee says today it is sceptical that, at £50bn, High Speed 2 will “deliver value for money for the taxpayer”. That’s not a huge surprise given that committee chair Margaret Hodge has been personally sceptical for some time.
Interestingly, though, the committee’s report on rail infrastructure spending also points out that HS2’s budget contains a “generous contingency” of £14.4bn, and that the team behind the project have failed to outline the economic benefits for Scotland.
The committee is right to point out these failings. The construction industry is notorious for eating up any contingency available, and one of the seemingly forgotten points of HS2, in the long term, was to speed up connections between London and the great Scottish cities of Edinburgh and Glasgow.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments