Margareta Pagano: A century on and Macmillan could inspire a route to bridge the capital gap
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.How about this for Groundhog day: "By the end of World War 1 successive merger waves had produced an oligopolistic, tightly cartelized, English banking system, which was widely viewed as having restricted lending to small to medium-sized firms – the famous Macmillan Gap in industrial finance. We explore the reasons behind the failure of market entry to bridge this gap. The clearing banks are shown to have acted as jealous monopolists, obstructing the activities of the Credit for Industry Ltd (CFI), the only significant firm established to breach the gap (rather than narrow its upper limit). By poaching many clients it had vetted and approved, the banks blocked CFI's growth, deterring further market entry, and thus, preserving their monopoly position."
This analysis by a group of economists of what went wrong at the beginning of the last century is as appropriate today as it was then. It prompted the Macmillan committee – which had identified the gap – to set up what was to become 3i in 1945 (through the merger of FCI and the Industrial and Commercial Finance Corporation, ICFC) with starting capital of £15m. By 1983 it had become the 3i brand and then floated on the London Stock Exchange in 1994, with a market capitalisation of £1.5bn. It's been a huge success and central to helping fund a myriad of new businesses – over the years it has lent more than £29bn and today manages assets of £8.9bn.
We need another 3i, or at least something similar to get capital flowing again into businesses of the future, and most crucially, for the UK to start making things again. Every era needs its own new creature and, as we report on the news pages, both the Conservatives and the Government are looking at how best to get money flowing again. New banks are one idea to break the paralysis but banks are never the source of seed-corn capital. For that, the real trick is to create an atmosphere in which investors are confident again, and that's not something which can be forced. But massive tax breaks would help.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments