Jim Armitage: RBS needs to reveal all over that Corsair sale
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook Expect much mud-slinging around the Royal Bank of Scotland's sale of 314 branches.
At issue are the terms the winning bidder, Corsair, accepted to beat off the stiff competition.
The sale had a fairly complex structure. Rather than flog the branches for cash, RBS opted to sell a bond that would transfer into shares in the business once it was floated on the stock market. To further complicate matters, part of the Corsair consortium's costs was financed by a loan from RBS.
Suspicions are that Corsair was preferred because it accepted a whopping 10 per cent interest rate from RBS on the financing loan. It is, indeed, hard to see why else the consortium would have accepted such a rate. Plenty of ammo for throwers of the brown stuff, of whom there are many due to the multitude of parties involved in the various failed bidding groups. But 'sources close to the deal' say that the actual rate was nowhere near as high, and that RBS went for the Corsair deal so it could retain a stake and gain from any future rise in value. This does seem more likely than the conspiracists' version of events.
But, so far, RBS refuses to comment on what it describes as a "private commercial transaction". This is patently not good enough. We taxpayers remain owners of 80 per cent of this bank. When it is selling a £600m asset in a complex manner, we deserve more than just a reassuring smile that RBS will see us right.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments