Jim Armitage: Defence big guns will want to target Hagel
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Global Outlook The defence group BAE is among the biggest British spenders on Washington lobbying, splurging $3.5m in 2012. Over the past five years, it's spent some $24m, according to OpenSecrets. That's twice as much as even Barclays did during the aftermath of the banking crisis. Rolls-Royce, another big supplier to the US military, spent $7.3m over that period.
One presumes the arrival of a new defence secretary in the form of Senator Chuck Hagel will mean a whole load more shoulders for BAE and Rolls to tap in Washington. Particularly as Mr Hagel looks likely to reduce US military intervention, and, inevitably, spending on equipment.
The Vietnam veteran attracted little funding from the weapons-making industry during his two terms in office, despite his glittering war record marking him out for a potential big job in defence department circles. No doubt the lobbyists in Washington are already scrambling to make up for lost time.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments