Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

James Moore: L&G has earned two cheers so far

James Moore
Wednesday 01 May 2013 01:07 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Outlook One of the institutions that did kick up a stink with WPP last year was Legal & General, which in general rewards its executives with a shade more restraint than most of its rivals. It seems the concept of "fiduciary duty" is not unknown there because WPP wasn't the only company to find itself on the wrong side of the insurer's governance team.

You can see just how many others were in that team's cross-hairs in its corporate governance report which confirms, as I reported a while back, that L&G was one of the most active investors during last year's shareholder spring.

In addition to WPP, there was the Glencore-Xstrata merger on which it held 15 meetings and played an instrumental role in the bonfire of a controversial executive retention package that showered millions upon company bosses for doing nothing more than turning up at their desks. Then there was Barclays, 11 meetings and a principled vote.

So two cheers for L&G. Only two? The third is being deferred because last year's shareholder spring was only a job half done. I'll award it to L&G as part of my version of a long-term incentive plan if it keeps up the pressure over some of the corporate world's more excessive equivalents.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in