Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

James Moore: Has Standard Chartered dug itself into a hole?

 

James Moore
Wednesday 14 January 2015 03:04 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Outlook The hard hats are on at Standard Chartered. Amazing to think that people were once prepared to call this the world’s best bank, although that’s not saying much, given the state of the industry.

Persistent problems with the US authorities over money laundering, executive departures, and a run of profit warnings have put that one to bed.

But is there another stone about to drop on the head of chief executive Peter Sands?

According to Credit Suisse, there is, in the form of Standard Chartered’s exposure to commodities. Its analysts reckon the bank might need as much as $4.4bn (£2.9bn) of additional capital to cover losses on its book this year as a result of the slump in global commodity prices. And it forecasts a chunky $2.6bn provision as part of that. Just to maintain its current capital provision.

Of course Credit Suisse is forced to use some guesswork, and that $4.4bn figure is based on an adverse scenario which may not come to pass.

All the same, you’d rather hope that some of those questions had been raised by the Prudential Regulation Authority. The spectre of a commodity crunch delivering such a painful blow to Standard Chartered’s capital position is something it ought to be worrying about for a bank in a stable situation. Which, with its numerous difficulties, Standard Chartered is not.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in