James Moore: Fireworks in store at Barclays meeting
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook Barclays' annual meeting on Friday could prove to be the best fireworks display this side of 5 November, or perhaps 4 July if, like the chief executive, Bob Diamond, you are of the transatlantic persuasion.
The company is used to a good turnout, not least because banks tend to have a lot of small shareholders and are not terribly good at looking after them when they take on the role of customers (as many do).
As ever, though, the really big guns will steer clear. Powerful fund managers like Standard Life Investments, which made a song and dance about voting against Barclays' remuneration report only to back down when offered a rather minor concession, are given privileged access to board members and are welcome to hop over to Canary Wharf whenever they want to have a grumble. So they don't waste their time with AGMs and, with the exception of the occasional pension fund trustee attending out of a sense of duty, most of the investors who turn up will have only a few thousand shares.
Often they will have made long journeys to attend, and as such like the idea of being heard. Sometimes they make good points, sometimes they just want to have a good rant, and who (given all that has happened in banking over the last five years) can blame them.
What is important is that they are at least given the chance to do so.
Critics of AGMs will often argue that they are a bit of a waste of effort, and that executives' valuable time would be better off deployed in overseeing the businesses they are paid enormous sums to run.
They are quite wrong. Surrounded by legions of yes men, modern executives have become increasingly detached from the world in which their companies live. The same is true for non-executive directors, who are often drawn from their ranks and frequently look amazed when their companies run into difficulties with the public.
They may find annual meetings to be a pain in the neck (you only need to look at the expressions on the faces of those up on stage to see that). But AGMs offer them a badly needed dose of reality.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments