James Moore: Don’t yawn, it’s time we moved governance up a gear
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook At its heart the slow pace of progress in getting more women into the boardroom is down to governance failings. The problems at Tesco are the biggest, and arguably ugliest, current example. If you’re the sort of person whose eyes glaze over when the “g” word is used, just read some of the cuttings generated by the supermarket that’s eating itself. What to do? The Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales (ICAEW) has some ideas, having decided that the UK corporate governance code is showing its age after 20 years.
There’s an irony in this particular organisation complaining about the system being “unable to deliver what’s required, for example in relation to issues such as diversity, tax avoidance and pay”. The big accountancy firms have their fingers in any number of tax avoidance schemes. Many run remuneration consultancies that have driven the relentless rise in executive pay.
All the same, the ICAEW is to be commended for at least recognising that there is a problem. Its suggested solution is to develop a framework of broad principles that modern companies should adhere to; this would sit above more specific codes for particular groups, simplifying the current messy proliferation of guidelines.
If it sounds woolly, that’s because it is. There’s not much in the way of specifics, and you can’t help but feel this is all about a desire on the part of the ICAEW to demonstrate (sigh) thought leadership. That said, its raising the question is timely. As Tesco desperately scrambles to restore its battered reputation, it’s time to move this particular debate into a higher gear.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments