Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

James Moore: Blast from big-shot bank chiefs is way off target

James Moore
Thursday 24 November 2011 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Outlook Once again the bigwigs of the banking world have been at the Treasury Select Committee.

Under Andrew Tyrie, these sessions don't quite resemble the Chinese-style "speak bitterness meetings" that they used to.

But there is still always the potential for some good knockabout stuff, particularly when bankers get as whiny as they did yesterday.

Royal Bank of Scotland chief executive Stephen Hester suggested that all the new regulations he faces will make investors see British banks as "a dumb place to put more capital".

He seems to have forgotten that it is the taxpayer whose capital is propping up his bank right now.

As for HSBC, it is fond of puffing out its chest because it took nothing from the taxpayer even though it came closer than its directors like to admit, thanks to its disastrous adventures in the US sub-prime market.

HSBC chairman Douglas Flint criticised a proposal by the Independent Commission on Banking to make banks hold more loss-absorbing capital via "bail-in" bonds.

He was at pains to stress that the bank isn't holding a Walther PPK to the Government's head as it ponders relocating. But he said the bonds' alleged £1.6bn cost is "too high to ignore".

Perhaps just a Beretta then?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in