James Moore: A timely reminder on inflation for Mr Osborne
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook Just like the Office for National Statistics to spoil things for George Osborne before he stands up at the despatch box to deliver what will probably be yet another gloomy Budget.
Inflation is on the march again and while today's small rise to 2.8 per cent could have been worse, the expectations are that it soon will be worse, and perhaps much worse.
A weak pound and rapidly rising fuel prices are a nasty combination; the pressure on household incomes is unrelenting. That will feed through to the economy. Mr Osborne's hopes that growth will re-emerge to help him meet his borrowing forecasts are looking increasingly forlorn.
From an environmental standpoint, it's unpalatable. But one way to ease some of the burden would be to take further action on fuel duty, which is weighing heavily on household budgets, particularly those in lower income brackets.
An adroit Chancellor would take note. Let's see if Mr Osborne's got it in him.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments